Snapshots: (1) Evolutionists/Darwinians justifying the continued use of Haeckel's Fraudulent Charts (2) Darwinians bullying those that are not deceived (3) Darwinians that obstinately defend and hold Darwinism (many seem to do this as a way to deny God).
What you will read--
- Evolutionist/Darwinist use of inference, selective evidence, and word tricks.
- Bully Techniques
- Another Agenda
- Conclusion
Some points (emphases ours throughout)--
- *** Evolutionist/Darwinist use of inference, selective evidence, and word tricks. ***
The drawings [Haeckel's drawings] are misleading in another way. Darwin based his inference of common ancestry on the belief that the EARLIEST stages of embryo development are the most similar. HAECKEL'S DRAWINGS, however, *ENTIRELY* OMIT THE EARLIEST stages, which are much different, and start at a more similar midway point. Embryologist William Ballard wrote in 1976 that it is "only by SEMANTIC TRICKS AND SUBJECTIVE SELECTION OF EVIDENCE," by "BENDING THE FACTS OF NATURE," that one can argue that the early stages of vertebrates "are more alike than their adults."In spite of its early exposure, Haeckel's fraudulent evidence is still being pointed to today, but some even take pictures of actual embryos and place them side by side to show what they present as similarities. The following quote is taken from a DVD entitled, "Icons of Evolution" (ISBN 0-9720433-1-4) [time: approximately 14:20]--
"Some textbooks actually use photographs of embryos but they pick only that stage and those classes that happen to look most similar; and they OMIT THE EARLIER STAGES [our note: remember that Darwin's conjecture of common ancestry was based on the belief THAT THE EARLIEST STAGES embryo development are the most similar.] and they omit those classes that do not look similar. So that, to me, is picking the evidence very carefully to support the theory--and that's not good science." [our note: the chart of photographed embryos which they showed on the subject video was reminiscent of Haeckel's embryo chart in the way that the photographs were arranged to show the similarities. EVEN THESE TYPES OF PHOTOGRAPHIC CHARTS ENTIRELY OMIT PICTURES OF THE EARLIEST STAGES of the embryos (which is where Darwin wrongly believed that the embryo development was most similiar) and then start at a more similar midway point. It looks like down through the years, even into the new millenium, Haeckel has had a stream of accomplices in perpetrating a fraud.]--Jonathan Wells, Biologist
- *** Bully Techniques ***
Example 1: It seems that evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould was not happy after a biochemist let the cat out of the bag about Ernst Haeckel's fraudulent embryo "evidence." Gould already knew about Haeckel's fraud but he seems to have went on the "attack" against the biochemist anyway--maybe because the information got out to the public. [Note: What is most remarkable about this is that people would even listen to confirmed Evolutionists/Darwinists (and others) like Gould who, in situations like this, do not appeal to reason and truth but rather act as brute beasts and bullies with their name-calling (or, rather, in this case, what they mean to be name-calling--for what they call "creationist" is actually someone who believes the truth, which is the Bible). But then again, modern man's passiveness and credulity (readiness to believe whatever the "important people" tell him) should not be surprising. Modern man has been brainwashed and he has not been taught good doctrine. After watching hour after hour of wickedness on television, he likes to see a fight and he does not mind foolishness--he is desensitized to it, he watches it often. Life is a spectator sport for him. Passively watching the media (television, newspapers, documentaries, magazines, etc.) deadens people's minds, makes them dull and desirous of continued doses of evil. To stop watching television is an abomination to them. They even start saying the same things their programmers say, whether newscaster, actor, singer, etc. (or some combination thereof).]
Excerpt from "Survival of the Fakest"--
According to the news media, only religious fundamentalists question Darwinian evolution. People who criticize Darwinism, we are told, want to bomb science back to the Stone Age and replace it with the Bible. The growing body of scientific evidence contradicting Darwinian claims is steadfastly ignored. When biochemist Michael Behe pointed out in The New York Times last year that the embryo "evidence" for evolution was faked, Harvard Darwinist Stephen Jay Gould admitted that he had known this for decades (as noted above) -- but accused Behe of being a "creationist" for pointing it out. [our note: perhaps inside his head Mr. Gould knows perfectly well that if evolution is wrong then God is the Creator. The truth is something that certain people will not have to hold. They will fight the truth until they are dead and can fight no more on earth deceving and being deceived. The stakes are high, they shall not prevail in the world to come, and they shall receive a just recompence of reward for their works.]Now, although Behe supports the idea that some features of living things are best explained by intelligent design, he is not a "creationist" as that word is normally used. Behe is a molecular biologist whose scientific work has convinced him that Darwinian theory doesn't conform to observation and experimental evidence. Why does Gould, who knows Haeckel's drawings were faked, dismiss Behe as a creationist for criticizing them? I suspect that there's an agenda other than pure science at work here.
Example 2. Quote taken from "Icons of Evolution" [time: approximately 00:28 seconds]. Consummate bully style--
"...if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid, or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that)."Richard Dawkins
Oxford UniversityTheir throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness:Romans 3:13-14As noted, the speaker showed his colors bully style in the subject excerpt. The speaker was not addressing facts, he diverted the attention from facts to blustering bully-style insults overflowing with contempt for those that disbelieve evolution stories, tales, fabrications, fake evidence, speeches, graphics, and spokesmen. It is indeed horrible to experience such outrageously rude, brutal, blustering, bristling demonstrations. Such demonstrations only serve to (1) marginalize and demean people who believe the truth, (2) make people pay for believing the truth, (3) prejudice ignorant people against the truth thereby (4) hindering ignorant people from considering the truth. With the truth obviously against evolution (and the revelation of so much fraudulent/fake evolution evidence--e.g., Haeckel's frauds, Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man, Peppered Moth, etc.), perhaps the committed Evolutionists/Darwinists feel like their backs are to the wall and that any filthy trick is good enough to fight their cause (evolution for the confirmed rebel is indeed a cause from which he will not back down from.).
Some definitions based on Webster's 1828 Dictionary--
BULLY, n. A noisy, blustering, overbearing fellow, more distinguished for insolence and empty menaces, than for courage, and disposed to provoke quarrels.BULLY, v.t. To insult and overbear with noise and blustering menaces.
INSOLENCE, n. Pride or haughtiness manifested in contemptuous and overbearing treatment of others; petulant contempt; impudence. INSOLENT, a. Proud and haughty, with contempt of others; overbearing; domineering in power....
INSOLENTLY, adv. With contemptuous pride; haughtily; rudely; saucily
SAUCY, a. Impudent; bold to excess; rude; transgressing the rules of decorum; treating superiors with contempt. [our note: More than once I've seen the speeches of rebels taken to the level of, "I don't care if I am wrong, who cares! Show me all the proof in the world in front of my face and I will still deny it!" That is the confirmed going-to-hell-and-will-work-for-hell type rebel that will die working for hell and they know it.]
IMPUDENCE, n. Shameless; want of modesty; effrontery; assurance accompanied with a disregard of the opinions of others.
IMPUDENTLY, adv. Shamelessly; with indecent assurance.
RAIL, v.i. To utter reproaches; to scoff; to use insolent and reproachful language; to reproach or censure [find fault, condemn as wrong] in opprobrious terms...
OPPROBRIOUS, a. 1. Reproachful and contemptuous; scurrilous; as opprobrious language; opprobrious words or terms.
2. Blasted with infamy; despised; RENDERED hateful [our note: history shows that a whole people can be made opprobrious through ungodly speeches by those in power. Whole peoples can be marginalized and made to be despised through continuous proclamations, decrees, speeches, unrighteous laws, etc. Nazi Germany was not the beginning of Jewish people having to wear something to distinguish them from others. This happened to them under the pope's dominion long before Hitler. False science has been used to distance people from the word of God, the Bible and to make it look like Christians are the enemy and "unscientific". It is not an impossibility for Christians to be marginalized in the United States of America. The ball is already rolling and we know that the man of sin is on the horizon. It would be totally unsurprising for false science to come up with some type of new lie (like "the God particle") to substantiate the panentheism that many are rushing towards...A PLACE WHERE SCIENCE AND DEVIL WORSHIP MEET. People are already contacting evil spirits through magic, yoga, contemplative "prayer", etc. One can see a blending of these magic techniques and "science" in a certain book that claims to be scientific research on an occult practice (I heard that when this practice was first introduced in the United States it could not get footing until a scientific spin was put on it). This book supposedly gives scientific-sounding explanations, but when reading the prefatory materials with clear eyes, one can see weak arguments, a story that seems to be oversimplified and with missing pieces, a blending and melding of science and the occult, talk of the "World Plan", plans to perpetuate "the Age of Enlightenment", and "training programs for the sake of rapidly creating enlightened individuals who will be the foundation of a perpetually enlightened society," and that "This activity for training Governors has now blossomed into the World Government for the Age of Enlightenment" etc.--all of these things, and more, are found in the course of four short pages (pages 1-4).]OPPROBRIOUSLY, adv. With reproach mingled with contempt; scurrilously.
SCURRILOUS, a. Using the low and indecent language of the manner sort of people, or such as only the licence of buffoons can warrant.
2. Containing low indecency or abuse; mean; foul; vile...SCURRILOUSLY, adv. With gross reproach; with low indecent language
- *** Another Agenda ***
From Survival of the Fakest-
I suspect that there's an agenda other than pure science at work here. My evidence is the more or less explicit materialist message [our note: as in, "There is only what you see and there is no God. You can therefore do what you feel like doing."] woven into many textbook accounts. Futuyma's Evolutionary Biology is characteristic of this, informing students that "it was Darwin's theory of evolution," together with Marx's theory of history and Freud's theory of human nature, "that provided a crucial plank to the platform of mechanism and materialism" that has since been "the stage of most Western thought." One textbook quotes Gould, who openly declares that humans are not created, but are merely fortuitous twigs on a "contingent" (i.e. accidental) tree of life. Oxford Darwinist Richard Dawkins, though not writing in a textbook, puts it even more bluntly: "DARWIN MADE IT POSSIBLE TO BE AN INTELLECTUALLY FULFILLED ATHEIST."These are obviously philosophical rather than scientific views. Futuyma, Gould, and Dawkins have a right to their philosophy. But they do not have the right to teach it as though it were science. In science, all theories -- including Darwinian evolution -- must be tested against the evidence.
Since Gould knows that the real embryological evidence contradicts the faked drawings in biology textbooks, why doesn't he take a more active role in cleaning up science education? The misrepresentations and omissions I've examined here are just a small sampling. There are many more. For too long the debate about evolution has assumed "facts" that aren't true. It's time to clear away the lies that obstruct popular discussion of evolution, and insist that theories conform to the evidence. In other words, it's time to do science as it's supposed to be done.
- *** Conclusion ***
People want to do what they feel like doing, but all persons will receive a just recompense of reward for what they do, whether what they do is evil or whether what they do is good before God our Maker.
Revelation 20:11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.
14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
Revelation 21:1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
3 And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.
4 And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
5 And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.
6 And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.
8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
[7-31-13]