Islam comes to take over your country

Mosques are popping up all over America. Islam has unhidden plans to take over the world by the worst brutality imaginable. Islam is invading and colonizing the world fueled by the money of Saudi Arabia. Everytime you buy gas you fuel their killing machine. That's where the money comes from for mosques and weapons. Open up your eyes, America and the world--your governments are selling you out to the enemy by denying that he even exists. It is all under the guise of "multi-culturalism". World domination is part of the Islamic religion and NOT simply the belief of "extremists".

The land of the "extremists" is the mother land
of every last one of the mosques that pepper the United States of America. Muslims may be quiet here (though they really are not--they teach, build mosques (including plans for a mosque near the site of 9-11 in New York), stand up for their "rights", and have jihad training camps), but they are seeking, and gaining,
the victory over the United States by open stealth with the invitation of the oily words of a treasonous American government. They are colonists with an allegiance to a foreign power that seeks to take over the world. Their book, the Quran teaches world conquest as the will of their god. If a Muslim says he does not agree with jihad then he cannot be a real Muslim because they are not allowed to disagree with their prophet. One website lists 164 jihad verses found in the Quran. Jihad and Islam go together.

Quran 9:123 "O you who believe, fight those of the unbelievers near you and let them see how harsh
you can be. Know that Allah is with the righteous." (Fakhry's translation)

If any Christian reading this watches television, then shame on you. TV is a den of iniquity and what you think is the news in brainwashing you. The media will keep making a difference between Islam and "Muslim extremists"--a dichotomy THAT DOES NOT EXIST. This act of making a difference pre-empts any suspicions of Islam that may arise from our ignorant pleasure-loving society (church people included). The governments of the world are determined to give all their power over to the beast and Islam is just one more destabilizing factor in bringing down the nations. Muslims form a ruthless army that will kill without mercy--this is just what the powers that be want. Those powers want the destruction of "Western civilization" and its traditions in order to make way for that brutal "New World Order" under the beast of Revelation 13 [Note: Do not forget the Roman Catholic Inquisitions--and how the great whore called forth her boyfriend rulers for "the secular arm". They arrested her victims for her and gave her safe harbor as she went about killing. Never forget the Mother.] Tv and the government will keep preaching multiculturalism and immigration until the United States is no longer the land of the free and we are a run down Communist state. That line about "the Great Melting Pot" was a successful way of welcoming the hordes of immigrants onto our shores.

We are going down. American education is so very poor that many of us didn't give the federal government purchase of General Motors a second thought. In Communism, the government owns the means of production. Obama's healthcare plan, for many of us, never brought to mind poor-stand-in-a-long-line-and-the-government-will-take-care-of-you socialized medicine. Read the between the lines and hear "redistribution of wealth". Our poor American education does not allow us to immediately think of Karl Marx and Communism. When the SEIC man said, "Workers of the word unite!" the words did not ring a bell for many of us. All these things reveal elements of classic Marxism/Communism.

The Beast is Coming

We know that the beast is coming and that there will be a one world leader. We also know that these will be the worst times that have ever existed in all of mankind's history. For those that think that they will escape troublous time via a secret rapture, you are in great deception. Ask God to clear your mind and search the scriptures. The dumb dog preachers have been lying to you, again.

Islam Taking Over Europe

Islam has all but taken over Europe. Read the comments of Dutch Parliamentarian Geert Wilders.

Muslim Rape Epidemic

swedish_woman_raped_by_Muslims Arab Muslims are raping women across Europe in their host countries (Swedish victim at left)--but as part of the multi-culturalism movement the news media is not reporting them as Muslims (just like they won't finger the sodomites when they commit grievous crimes). Looking up the search terms, "Muslim rape" revealed many articles concerning this epidemic. Lust-filled rapist Arab Muslim men are a menace in France, Sweden, and Norway. The French even have a word for one form of Muslim gang rape, "tournante". Australia and India are not immune. This is not mentioning the horrors endured in the Sudan. Their own Muslim women are not immune. I viewed a disturbing video on Pakistani rape laws (I do not suggest anyone try to find it as the supplemental advertisements on the page are very wicked). Rape is a part of Islam, part of the rewards and spoils of jihad. In their paradise there are 72 virgins that are chained up for men's pleasure. The following is excerpted from

The figures on Muslim rape of Western women in Europe are astounding. In Denmark and Norway, between 65% and 70% of all rapes are committed by Muslims, who as yet [are] still less than 5% of the population. One local judge in Norway actually exonerated one rapist by accepting his defense that the victim's dress was taken by him to mean that she was egging him on. Her dress was nothing special to Norwegians, but the judge found it to be unbearably provocative to this poor Muslim immigrant...

The argument now seems to be: Western mores are offensive. Western women are cheap and offensive. We Muslims are here, here to stay, and we have a right to take advantage of this situation. It is our view of the matter that should prevail. Western goods, like the land on which we now live, belong to Allah and to the best of men -- his Believers. Western women, too, essentially belong to us -- our future booty. Western laws may "apply" but not in any sense that really counts or that we reocgnize. We recognize Islamic law, the sharia, and according to that we are simply exhibiting the attiudes toward Infidels that are drummed into us, that are right and according to the laws of Allah. Why should we act differently? Oh, and if we happen to act, as some of the Islamic websites tell us we can act, in accordance with the local laws -- but only insofar as they do not contradict Islam -- that is only because of darura, the doctrine of necessity -- and that necessity, that darura, is of course only temporary.

Lebanese and Pakistani Muslim scoundrels (as well as Muslims from other Islamic lands) are gang raping women across the sea from us. It is easy to find internet news stories such as "Pan-European Arab Muslim Gang Rape Epidemic". It is an epidemic (it would be unsurprising if other thugs to picked up the habit with all the lust in the world. Just thinking about this brings to mind (1) the rabid sodomites of Sodom who wanted to force lot and (2) the sodomites who forced the Levite's concubine until she died--Judges 19). Lust is one of the rewards of Islam in the east--even if Western Muslims don't know it. We Americans are a completely ignorant population because we've rejected King Jesus who makes every lie and every deception and every false doctrine crystal clear. Instead of the Bible, America went with "free love" and the Roman "bread and circuses" and treats and now we are sitting here looking like the sots that we are. The dollar is going away and the government is becoming more and more Communist and despotic by the second.

Years ago, when we published this article on Muslims raping children, I had no idea of the place of rape in Islam. But what I have learned today shows me that this Islamic rape policy has long been in place. These are brutal rapes--beating until almost dead, cutting off breasts, etc. whatever abomination that Satan and the wicked can work.

Muslims populations are increasing all over. They are having children and filling up Europe while the west goes on in whoredom and abortions. Just because Americans don't feel it now, do not think for one minute that we will remain immune from the curse of Islam. The "Beltway snipers" MUHAMMAD and Malvo were Muslims. Malvo was an artist and depicted various scenes and wrote "jihad" several times on one page and drew pictures of terrorists as heros, etc. The Fort Hood massacre was a jihad waged by a Major in the United States military who shouted "Allah Akbar" as he shot his fellowsoldiers.

Muslims commit a disproportionate number of rapes in some of their European host countries. European jails are becoming filled up with Muslim thugs and scoundrels. Islam is making war with the world (raping women is part of the spoils), meanwhile the United States Government ( basically says, "Come on in! We'll even make our schools respect all your 'holy' days!" Muslims are recruiting American criminals in the jails and they are becoming a part of their jihad force--Christian Action Network ( has footage showing Muslim guerrilla training camps in the United States. AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT IS COVERING IT UP--the footage was leaked out. But make no mistake, jihad takes many forms, NOT JUST OUTWARD VIOLENCE. Jihad can be waged in courtrooms. There are Muslims that specialize in suing citizens in courts. They come to our country and sue people with our laws designed for an honest society. There are no churches in their countries but they come here with money and build the biggest most ostentacious mosques they can littering the landscape. They say behead those that "insult Islam" and then take us to court in an attempt to censor and suppress free speech. [Aside: Censorship of the truth is not new. Rome had the Bible on its "Index Librorum Prohibitorum" (index of prohibited books) in 1559 (see]

The poor Muslim women are not immune to this brutality. Pakistani rape laws are impossible. The victim becomes the criminal. I read that 75% of women in their jails are rape VICTIMS charged with adultery. Sometimes the rape victim is killed in an "honor killing" because of the shame "she" brings on the family by being raped. Sometimes she is encouraged to commit suicide because "she shamed the family". They and their children are not off the hook when the get to the United States, either--

Muslim Television Channel Founder Charged With Beheading His Wife. The estranged wife of a Muslim television executive feared for her life after filing for divorce last month from her abusive husband, her attorney said — and was then found beheaded Thursday in his upstate New York television studio. Aasiya Z. Hassan, 37, was found dead on Thursday at the offices of Bridges TV in Orchard Park, N.Y., near Buffalo. Her husband, Muzzammil Hassan, 44, has been charged with second-degree murder.,2933,493645,00.html

Honor Killing in Texas by Robert Spencer. Amina Said, 18, and her sister Sarah, 17, smile happily in one widely circulating photo, and Amina is wearing what looks like a sweatshirt bearing the name “AMERICAN.” But their fate may have been the herald of a new, disquieting feature of the American landscape: honor killing. Amina and Sarah were shot dead in Irving, Texas, on New Year’s Day. Police are searching for their father, Yaser Abdel Said, on a warrant for capital murder.

On one section of there are many videos showing the horrors and criminality of Islam--Muslims cutting off heads, honor killings, the horrors and fears of women living under Sharia law, a young woman slashed with knife all over her body by her husband for talking with a male neighbor without a chaperone. Also on is an expose on CAIR--the Council on American-Islamic Relations--a front group for Islam that was recently infiltrated by a brave soul that brought out evidence of Islam's/CAIR's deep infilitration of American institutions and Islam's goals to sabotage America and to destroy her from within, to undermine her like moles. This evidence is presented in "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America" by P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry. The radio interview reveals that CAIR lawyers are waging legal jihad against America bullying anyone who seeks to expose the Islamic threat. CAIR seeks to decrease anti-terror laws and to penetrate our institutions. They are being successful as they can easily slip through the multiculturalism, relativism, and diversity called for by a wicked country that wants to hear about anything other than the Lord Jesus Christ and his word.

The menace of Islam is just one more theatre of chaos pummeling the heads of a wicked, antichrist, abortion rights, pleasure loving world. Chaos and upheaval will continue--to a certain point. Someone is waiting in the wings for his moment. He is going to rise in the hour of his power and the whole world will wonder after him...

We must pray for these very unfortunate Muslim women and men trapped under Sharia law. We must pray for those who have become Christians. They are tortured, enslaved, very shamefully treated, and killed. Many Muslims in these countries live in perpetual fear. How can they hear when a group of thugs is always watching their every move. Thugs are raping women and then having them thrown in jail for adultery? How can a Muslim woman hear this word? God cares about their souls. How are they going to be saved by Jesus if they do not know his gospel? Those women are in such a lock down under these monsters that they can hardly make a move without offending the men around them. Just viewing the video footage of the young woman slashed by her husband grieved me in my depths as I lay upon my bed. WE MUST PRAY FOR THESE WOMEN.

Have respect unto the covenant: for the dark places of the earth are still full of the habitations of cruelty (ref. Ps 74:20). Think about your agreement with God. Be true to it. Honour men. Pray for men. Quit fear. Gird up the loins of your mind. Watch at God's gates and be about his business for the few moments that we have left. Watch unto prayer--read and consider this information and take it to God in prayer. If you were in such distress, you would want somebody to pray for you. Why not do the same for others?

***Muslim rape in Europe***

Young European girls are a favored rape target, young ones too. I do not recommend that anyone search the internet on this issue. It is my hope that you have enough information in these and other pages of this website to satisfy you. All the foundations of the earth are out of course and we know who is at the root of it--the devil and his masterpiece. The following are excerpts from the internet--

Today's news from Germany buries the fact that the gang rapists of a 13 year-old were likely Arab Muslim immigrants:

Shock in Berlin as Suspected Rapists Freed

Nowhere is the news reported that this is part of a gang rape epidemic sweeping areas with high Arab Muslim immigration.

As is the case with young Arab Muslims throughout the West, teenage girls are generally forbidden to go out, leaving separatist gangs of predatory Arab Muslim males with highly misogynist attitudes. Harassment of females has therefore exploded throughout the West, most shockingly demonstrated in the recent phenomenon of gang rape for sport. Listed below is the evidence.

While these cases are primarily not related to the core group of committed Islamists within Arab Muslim immigrant populations, there is some "trickle-down" of attitudes so it is also worth noting the rape aspects of Jihad ideology as well: The Rape Jihad.


Shock in Berlin as Suspected Rapists Freed

The youths, aged 13 to 15, allegedly attacked their victim as she walked home from school in the Charlottenburg district which is generally seen as safe area with low crime rates.

While allegedly gang-raping the girl, the youths are reported to have filmed the sexual attack with a mobile phone camera. Media reports say the four later boasted about the rape to other school children and sent copies of the video to friends.

Police who detained the four earlier this week have so far not found any film footage of the alleged rape. There is suspicion the video pictures may have been erased and mobile phones of the suspects are being analysed by experts in a bid to retrieve any pictures....

Adding to the potential explosiveness of the alleged rape is the fact that the four suspects are all the children of immigrant families, while the victim is German. The normally well-informed Bild tabloid said the suspects were two German-Turks, a German Russian and a German-Angolan.

Federal police statistics released on Monday show non-German youths under the age of 21 were twice as likely to be crime suspects last year than German nationals of the same age.

Officers in charge of the case are convinced the four youths carried out the gang rape and DNA tests are being carried out on sperm traces found on the victim.

Given the brutality of the attack, there has been anger over a decision by Berlin justice officials to order the youths be set free. The 13-year-old suspect is too young to be kept in detention under German law, but the other three could be held.

Berlin justice Senator Karin Schubert insists, however, that even youths suspected of violent crimes can only be kept locked up if there is danger they will flee justice.

Racial Gangrape: Another Diversity Disaster

In Nice, Gang Rape Video of a Female Student is Circulating Freely Among Muslim Immigrants


Immigrant Rape Wave in Sweden

Swedish girls Jenny and Linda were on their way to a party on New Year's Eve when they were assaulted, raped and beaten half to death by four Somali IMMIGRANTS. Sweden's largest newspaper has presented the perpetrators as "two men from Sweden, one from Finland and one from Somalia", a testimony as to how bad the informal censorship is in stories related to immigration in Sweden. Similar incidents are reported with shocking frequency, to the point where some observers fear that law and order is completely breaking down in the country. The number of rape charges in Sweden has tripled in just above twenty years. Rape cases involving children under the age of 15 are six - 6 - times as common today as they were a generation ago....

According to a new study from the Crime Prevention Council, Br, it is four times more likely that a known rapist is born abroad, compared to persons born in Sweden. Resident aliens from Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia dominate the group of rape suspects. According to these statistics, almost half of all perpetrators are immigrants....

A group of Swedish teenage girls has designed a belt that requires two hands to remove and which they hope will deter would-be rapists. "It's like a reverse chastity belt," one of the creators, 19-year-old Nadja Bjrk, told AFP, meaning that the wearer is in control, instead of being controlled. Bjrk and one of her partners now plan to start a business to mass produce the belts....

In an online readers' poll from the newspaper Aftonbladet, 82% of the women expressed fear to go outside after dark. There are reports of rapes happening in broad daylight....

"It is not as wrong raping a Swedish girl as raping an Arab girl," says Hamid. "The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards.... But the Arab girl will get problems with her family. For her, being raped is a source of shame. It is important that she retains her virginity until she marries." It was no coincidence that it was a Swedish girl that was gang raped in Rissne this becomes obvious from the discussion with Ali, Hamid, Abdallah and Richard. All four have disparaging views on Swedish girls, and think this attitude is common among young men with immigrant background. "It is far too easy to get a Swedish whore girl, I mean;" says Hamid, and laughs over his own choice of words. "Many immigrant boys have Swedish girlfriends when they are teenagers. But when they get married, they get a proper woman from their own culture who has never been with a boy. That's what I am going to do. I don't have too much respect for Swedish girls..."

Muslim Rape Epidemic in Sweden and Norway

...doubling of the number of reported rapes by ambush in 2004, following what was already a decade of steadily increasing numbers of sexual crimes

the number of reported rapes against children is on the rise. The figures have nearly doubled in the last ten years: 467 rapes against children under the age of 15 were reported in 2004 compared with 258 in 1995. Legal proceedings continue this week in a case involving a 13 year old girl from Motala who was said to have been subjected to a group rape by four men. (Note: These four men were Kurdish Muslims, who raped the girl for hours and even took photos of doing so).

Amanda and Molin Raped by Immigrant Gang (Swedish)

Muslim Rape Wave in Sweden

Rape charges in the capital are spiraling upwards, 40 percent higher from 1999 to 2000 and up 13 percent so far this year. Police Inspector Gunnar Larsen of Oslo's Vice, Robbery and Violent crime division says the statistics are surprising - the rising number of rape cases and the link to ethnic background are both clear trends....While 65 percent of those charged with rape are classed as coming from a non-western background, this segment makes up only 14.3 percent of Oslo's population. Norwegian women were the victims in 80 percent of the cases, with 20 percent being women of foreign background.


Alarmed at last week's police statistics, which revealed that in 68% of all rapes committed this year the perpetrator was from an ethnic MINORITY, leading Muslim organisations have now formed an alliance to fight the ever-growing problem of young second and third-generation immigrants involved in rape cases against young Danish girls.
See also: Copenhagen Mufti Declares Women who Refuse to Wear Headscarves are "Asking for Rape"

Caveats: There are two technical imprecisions in this post that were blurred for readability. Australia is not European. Also, among Western immigrants, Arabs and Muslims are different, but highly overlapping, groups. The phenomenon is highest among those who are Arab and Muslim, and largely unknown among non-Muslim Arabs.

What do Muslims believe?

Muslims rape children while crying, "Allah is great!"

Sudan jihad forces Islam on Christians (Women refusing to convert gang-raped, mutilated, says relief worker)


UK: Muslim Rape Spree Against Infidel Women Continues
* because the greatest crime in Gordon Browns pig sty is to be accused of being a 'racist Islamophobe'- which brings the PC-police out in full force...


Recently a BBC announcer was sacked/fired for requesting a "non Asian taxi driver" to transport her young unaccompanied 14 year old daughter. (Out of concern for her daughter's fears/mental well being & safety)

Of course, the "racist" club was trotted out by the mainstream media and others to verbally bludgeon Sam Mason for having the audacity to demand an "English driver". But was Sam Mason really exposing her racism or was she reacting, as any mother would, to the facts that there is a ongoing epidemic of muslim taxi driver rapes in the UK? (Note: the media prefers the more vague term "Asian")

The Opinionator

Not surprising - the mainstream media, is aiding and abetting these rapes, by refusing to "connect the dots" and report on the clear evidence: The growing numbers of predatory muslim taxi drivers (some posing as taxi drivers)raping British girls and women.

Here are some - but far from all - examples of muslim taxi driver rapists:

Abul Malik. 29. raped 19 yr. old female student - he was angry she didn't have all the fare money - Oct 2008

Salam Rahman, 27, and his friend, 26-year-old Mohammed Elahi - along with two other men - gang raped two women - a newlywed and a city worker - Aug 2002 (Police said after the case that they feared these were not isolated cases and appealed for any woman who may have suffered a similar attack to come forward.)

Assadullah Razaq, 31, raped 28 yr. old secretary - Mar 2003

Mohanid Al obaydi, raped 22 yr old woman (was found guilty), Apr 2005

Ghulam Haider, 49, brutally raped 16 yr old girl Aug 2006

Murtaza Mateen, aged 47, lured 42 year old woman into his taxi & raped her, Jan 2007

Shahjahan Islam, 27, linked by DNA to attempted rape of lone young woman, Nov 2008

Rami Kayyali, 26, found guilty of raping young woman, Nov 2008

Asian - bogus taxi driver, in his mid-20s, wanted for attempted rape of 18 yr. old girl, Mar 2008

Asian male, aged in his late 20s or early 30s, wanted for brutal rape of 24 yr old woman, Aug 2008

Asian "taxi driver", in his 40s, sought in rape of teenager, Nov 2008

Also disgustingly prevalent are examples of dhimmi members of the British police denying and intentionally obfuscating of the epidemic of muslim taxi drivers raping British women:

Speaking after Kayyali's conviction, Detective Sergeant Andy Willmott said: "Thankfully these types of crimes are very rare, but that makes it no less distressing for the young woman subjected to an attack by this man."

Detective Inspector Terry Sweeney, from Stockport CID, said: "This was a horrifying experience that no woman should ever have to go through. While we like to reassure women that incidents like this are relatively few and far between, nonetheless a woman has been raped and the man responsible is still at large. So women should be very careful when getting into taxis and make sure they are legitimate."

[Note: If someone wants to keep their job these days, they oftentimes have to suppress the truth and accept lies or keep silent. ]

Denial is bad but some other members of the law enforcement were crass & negligent enough to place a semi naked woman - who police believed had just been raped by a taxi driver - back into a taxi ALONE rather than providing her with safe transportation home.

So can we really blame Sam Mason for being worried about her 14 year old daughter traveling alone with an "Asian" driven mini cab/taxi? Was she being "racist" - or is she a realist?

[The following man saw a forthcoming threat to Great Britain via mass immigration. His concern was the black man and he used the United States as an example of what his country could become. Black people in the United States, by design, became something other than they had to be. As a black person, this I know and I have no need to be up in arms about these comments. In 2009, for the first time, I felt like a stranger in my own country. It was as if I looked up and everyone around me was from somewhere else. I was in a new grocery store (that had formerly been a large grocery chain store) where I felt like an unwelcomed stranger. I am by no means prejudiced. We are all children of Adam. I have long enjoyed the companion ship of hispanic people and speak intermediate-level Spanish. Yet, by and by I am coming to understand what is happening. King James, in one of his speeches before Parliament let Rome (as in the Roman Catholic institution) know that he was watching her should she look to overwhelm his kingdom with immigrants. Samuel Breese Morse warned America in the early 1800s of the Roman Catholic conspiracy to overwhelm the United States with immigrants. They come here with a subservient attitude and dedication to the papacy. Perhaps this section seems irrelevant to this page, but the mass influx of immigrants, the communist national health care bill, the burdens on U.S. citizens and business, the anti-discrimination laws in the following speech are what we are experiencing.]

John Enoch Powell (1912-1998) was a Member of Parliament who won fame for his 1968 "Rivers of Blood" speech in which he pointed out the danger of mass Third World immigration into Britain. He was also a classical scholar who was fluent in Latin and Greek, and was so intelligent that he was made a professor at the age of 25. Elected to Parliament, he served in the cabinet and shadow cabinets and was earmarked as a future prime minister until his dismissal by the traitorous Tory Party.

Here is the full text of Enoch
Powell's famous Rivers of Blood speech to the Annual
General Meeting of the West Midlands Area Conservative Political
Centre, Birmingham, England, April 20, 1968.

The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature. One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: At each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.

Above all, people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles and even for desiring troubles: 'if only', they love to think, 'if only people wouldn't talk about it, it probably wouldn't happen'. Perhaps this habit goes back to the primitive belief that the word and the thing, the name and the object, are identical. At all events, the discussion of future grave but, with effort now, avoidable evils is the most unpopular and at the same time the most necessary occupation for the politician. Those who knowingly shirk it, deserve, and not infrequently receive, the curses of those who come after.

A week or two ago I fell into conversation with a constituent, a middle-aged, quite ordinary working man employed in one of our nationalized industries. After a sentence or two about the weather, he suddenly said: 'If I had the money to go, I wouldn't stay in this country.' I made some deprecatory reply, to the effect that even this Government wouldn't last for ever; but he took no notice, and continued: 'I have three children, all of them have been through grammar school and two of them married now, with family. I shan't be satisfied till I have seen them settled overseas. In this country in fifteen or twenty years' time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.'

I can already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing? How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation? The answer is that I do not have the right not to do so. Here is a decent, ordinary fellow Englishman, who in broad daylight in my own town says to me, his Member of Parliament, that this country will not be worth living in for his children. I simply do not have the right to shrug my shoulders and think about something else. What he is saying, thousands and hundreds of thousands are saying and thinking - not throughout Great Britain, perhaps, but in the areas that are already undergoing the total transformation to which there is no parallel in a thousand years of English history.

In fifteen or twenty years, on present trends, there will be in this country 3 1/2 million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure. That is the official figure given to Parliament by the spokesman of the Registrar General's office. There is no comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it must be in the region of 5-7 million, approximately one-tenth of the whole population, and approaching that of Greater London. Of course, it will not be evenly distributed from Margate to Aberystwyth and from Penzance to Aberdeen. Whole areas, towns and parts of towns across England will be occupied by different sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population.

As time goes on, the proportion of this total who are immigrant descendants, those born in England, who arrived here by exactly the same route as the rest of us, will rapidly increase. Already by 1985 the native-born would constitute the majority. It is this fact above all which creates the extreme urgency of action now, of just that kind of action which is hardest for politicians to take, action where the difficulties lie in the present but the evils to be prevented or minimized lie several parliaments ahead.

The natural and rational first question with a nation confronted by such a prospect is to ask: 'How can its dimensions be reduced?' Granted it be not wholly preventable, can it be limited, bearing in mind that numbers are of the essence: the significance and consequences of an alien element introduced into a country or population are profoundly different according to whether that element is 1 per cent or 10 per cent. The answers to the simple and rational question are equally simple and rational: by stopping or virtually stopping, further inflow, and by promoting the maximum outflow. Both answers are part of the official policy of the Conservative Party.

It almost passes belief that at this moment twenty or thirty additional immigrant children are arriving from overseas in Wolverhampton alone every week - and that means fifteen or twenty additional families of a decade or two hence. Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre. So insane are we that we actually permit unmarried persons to immigrate for the purpose of founding a family with spouses and fiancées whom they have never seen.

Let no one suppose that the flow of dependants will automatically tail off. On the contrary, even at the present admission rate of only 5,000 a year by voucher, there is sufficient for a further 325,000 dependants per annum ad infinitum, without taking into account the huge reservoir of existing relations in this country - and I am making no allowance at all for fraudulent entry. In these circumstances nothing will suffice but that the total inflow for settlement should be reduced at once to negligible proportions, and that the necessary legislative and administrative measures be taken without delay. I stress the words 'for settlement'.

This has nothing to do with the entry of Commonwealth citizens, any more than of aliens, into this country, for the purposes of study or of improving their qualifications, like (for instance) the Commonwealth doctors who, to the advantage of their own countries, have enabled our hospital service to be expanded faster than would otherwise have been possible. These are not, and never have been, immigrants.

I turn to re-emigration. If all immigration ended tomorrow, the rate of growth of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population would be substantially reduced, but the prospective size of this element in the population would still leave the basic character of the national danger unaffected. This can only be tackled while a considerable proportion of the total still comprises persons who entered this country during the last ten years or so. Hence the urgency of implementing now the second element of the Conservative Party's policy: the encouragement of re-emigration.

Nobody can make an estimate of the numbers which, with generous grants and assistance, would choose either to return to their countries of origin or to go to other countries anxious to receive the manpower and the skills they represent. Nobody knows, because no such policy has yet been attempted. I can only say that, even at present, immigrants in my own constituency from time to time come to me, asking if I can find them assistance to return home. If such a policy were adopted and pursued with the determination which the gravity of the alternative justifies, the resultant outflow could appreciably alter the prospects for the future.

It can be no part of any policy that existing family should be kept divided; but there are two directions in which families can be reunited, and if our former and present immigration laws have brought about the division of families, albeit voluntary or semi-voluntarily, we ought to be prepared to arrange for them to be reunited in their countries of origin. In short, suspension of immigration and encouragement of re-emigration hang together, logically and humanly, as two aspects of the same approach.

The third element of the Conservative Party's policy is that all who are in this country as citizens should be equal before the law and that there shall be no discrimination or difference made between them by public authority. As Mr. Heath has put it, we will have no 'first-class citizens' and 'second-class citizens'. This does not mean that the immigrant and his descendants should be elevated into a privileged or special class or that the citizen should be denied his right to discriminate in the management of his own affairs between one fellow citizen and another or that he should be subjected to inquisition as to his reasons and motives for behaving in one lawful manner rather than another.

There could be no grosser misconception of the realities than is entertained by those who vociferously demand legislation as they call it 'against discrimination', whether they be leader-writers of the same kidney and sometimes on the same newspapers which year after year in the 1930s tried to blind this country to the rising peril which confronted it, or archbishops who live in palaces, faring delicately with the bedclothes pulled right over their heads. They have got it exactly and diametrically wrong. The discrimination and the deprivation, the sense of alarm and resentment, lies not with the immigrant population but with those among whom they have come and are still coming. This is why to enact legislation of the kind before Parliament at this moment is to risk throwing a match on to the gunpowder. The kindest thing that can be said about those who propose and support it is they know not what they do.

Nothing is more misleading than comparison between the Commonwealth immigrant in Britain and the American Negro. The Negro population of the United states, which was already in existence before the United States became a nation, started literally as slaves and were later given the franchise and other rights of citizenship, to the exercise of which they have only gradually and still incompletely come. The Commonwealth immigrant came to Britain as a full citizen, to a country which knows no discrimination between one citizen and another, and he entered instantly into the possession of the rights of every citizen, from the vote to free treatment under the National Health Service. Whatever drawbacks attended the immigrants - and they were drawbacks which did not, and do not, make admission into Britain by hook or by crook appear less than desirable - arose not from the law or from public policy or from administration but from those personal circumstances and accidents which cause, and always will cause, the fortunes and experience of one man to be different for another's.

But while to the immigrant entry to this country was admission to privileges and opportunities eagerly sought, the impact upon the existing population was very different. For reasons which they could not comprehend, and in pursuance of a decision by default, on which they were never consulted, they found themselves made strangers in their own country. They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted. On top of this, they now learn that a one-way privilege is to be established by Act of Parliament: a law, which cannot, and is not intended, to operate to protect them or redress their grievances, is to be enacted to give the stranger, the disgruntled and the agent provocateur the power to pillory them for their private actions.

In the hundreds upon hundreds of letters I received when I last spoke on this subject two or three months ago, there was one striking feature which was largely new and which I find ominous. All Members of Parliament are used to the typical anonymous correspondent; but what surprised and alarmed me was the high proportion of ordinary, decent, sensible people, writing a rational and often well-educated letter, who believed that they had to omit their address because it was dangerous to have committed themselves to paper to a Member of Parliament agreeing with the views I had expressed, and that they would risk either penalties or reprisals if they were known to have done so. The sense of being a persecuted minority which is growing among ordinary English people in the areas of the country which are affected is something that those without direct experience can hardly imagine. I am going to allow just one of those hundreds of people to speak for me. She did give her name and address, which I have detached from the letter which I am about to read. She was writing from Northumberland about something which is happening at this moment in my own constituency:

Eight years ago in a respectable street in Wolverhampton a house was sold to a Negro. Now only one white (a woman old-age pensioner) lives there. This is her story. She lost her husband and both her sons in the war. So she turned her seven-roomed house, her only asset, into a boarding house. She worked hard and did well, paid off her mortgage and began to put something by for her old age. Then the immigrants moved in. With growing fear, she saw one house after another taken over. The quiet streets became a place of noise and confusion.

Regretfully, her white tenants moved out.

The day after the last one left, she was awakened at 7 a.m. by two Negroes who wanted to use her phone to contact their employer. When she refused, as she would have refused any stranger at such an hour, she was abused and feared she would have been attacked but for the chain on her door. Immigrant families have tried to rent rooms in her house, but she always refused. Her little store of money went, and after paying her rates, she had less than £2 per week. She went to apply for a rate reduction and was seen by a young girl, who on hearing she had a seven-roomed house, suggested she should let part of it. When she said the only people she could get were Negroes, the girl said 'racial prejudice won't get you anywhere in this country'. So she went home.

The telephone is her lifeline. Her family pay the bill, and help her out as best they can. Immigrants have offered to buy her house - at a price which the prospective landlord would be able to recover from his tenants in weeks, or at most in a few months. She is becoming afraid to go out.

 Windows are broken. She finds excreta pushed through her letterbox. When she goes to the shops, she is followed by children, charming, wide-grinning piccaninnies. They cannot speak English, but one word they know. 'Racialist', they chant. When the new Race Relations Bill is passed, this woman is convinced she will go to prison. And is she so wrong? I begin to wonder.

The other dangerous delusion from which those who are wilfully or otherwise blind to realities suffer, is summed up in the word 'integration'. To be integrated into a population means to become for all practical purposes indistinguishable from its other members. Now, at all times, where there are marked physical differences, especially of colour, integration is difficult though, over a period, not impossible. There are among the Commonwealth immigrants have come to live here in the last fifteen years or so, many thousands whose wish and purpose is to be integrated and whose every thought and endeavour is bent in that direction. But to imagine that such a thing enters the heads of a great and growing majority of immigrants and their descendants is a ludicrous misconception, and a dangerous one to boot.

We are on the verge of here of a change. Hitherto it has been force of circumstance and of background which has rendered the very idea of integration inaccessible to the greater part of the immigrant population - that they never conceived or intended such a thing, and that their numbers and physical concentration meant the pressures towards integration which normally bear upon any small minority did not operate. Now we are seeing the growth of positive forces acting against integration, of vested interests in the preservation and sharpening of racial and religious differences, with a view to the exercise of action domination, first over fellow immigrants and then over the rest of the population. The cloud no bigger than a man's hand, that can so rapidly overcast the sky, has been visible recently in Wolverhampton and has shown signs of spreading quickly. The words I am about to use, verbatim as they appeared in the local press on 17 February, are not mine, but those of a Labour Member of Parliament who is a Minister in the present Government.

The Sikh communities' campaign to maintain customs inappropriate in Britain is much to be regretted. Working in Britain, particularly in the public services, they should be prepared to accept the terms and conditions of their employment. To claim special communal rights (or should one say rites?) leads to a dangerous fragmentation within society. This communalism is a canker: whether practised by one colour or another it is to be strongly condemned.

All credit to John Stonehouse for having had the insight to perceive that, and the courage to say it.

For these dangerous and divisive elements the legislation proposed in the Race Relations Bill is the very pabulum they need to flourish. Here is the means of showing that the immigrant communities can organize to consolidate their members, to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to overawe and dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant and the ill-informed have provided. As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding.

Like the Roman, I seem to see 'the River Tiber foaming with much blood'. That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect. Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the century.

Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now. Whether there will be the public will to demand and obtain that action, I do not know. All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.

Life in Muslim countries is not easy for women and girls. Found on the internet--

  • Saudi gang rape victim gets 200 lashes.
  • Saudi Arabia: Gang rape victim sentenced to prison, 100 lashes
  • Saudi Judge Sentences Pregnant Gang-Rape Victim to 100 Lashes
  • Saudi Gang rape victim in danger of "Honor killing" from own family
  • Gang rape just "harmless fun" says Lawyer (Bahrain)
  • Jordan: Rape victim killed by uncle to cleanse family honor
  • Afghan President pardons men convicted of bayonet gang rape
  • Bangladeshi muslims gang-rape 13 year old Pastor's daughter
  • Muslim Thieves Rape Girl When They Realize Victim is Christian
  • First Saudi woman minister cannot appear on TV without permission
  • The Saudi Woman is ALWAYS guilty
  • Pakistan: Woman set ablaze by husband dies
  • Saudi Gang-Rape Victim Faces 90 Lashes
  • Saudi Arabia: 75 Year old woman to get 40 lashes for breach of "sex segregation laws"
  • Saudi court rules 8 year old girl cannot divorce 47 year old man until she hits puberty
  • Malaysian woman faces flogging for drinking a beer
  • Saudi court DENIES 8 year old girl divorce from 58 year old man.
  • Man says will wait to consummate marriage with 10-year-old Hail girl
  • Muslim cleric OK's sex with 9 year old girls
  • Police arrest mullah for marrying off 7 year old girl
  • Calls for end to Saudi child marriages
  • Elderly Saudi woman sentenced to lashings for "un-islamic" behavior
  • Saudi accused of having six wives
  • Pakistan: Girls, aged 5 and 8 given up for marriage to 23 and 15 year old males

The pope kissing the Koran.

| Eternal Life | Hell is Real | The Gospel According to John |
| My Testimony |Why I Read the Authorized KJV Bible|
| Hymns | Messianic Prophecies Fulfilled by Jesus Christ |
| Epistle Dedicatory to the Authorized King James of 1611 |

Jesus Christ is the ONLY Way to God